0.9k
1.1k
788
404
1kEinstein, in his General Theory of Relativity derived the force of gravity in terms of the geometry of space and time. Unfortunately he was unable describe the other forces in nature, above all those of electromagnetism, in same terms, as was documented by the American Institute of Physics.
“From before 1920 until his death in 1955, Einstein struggled to find laws of physics far more general than any known before. In his theory of relativity, the force of gravity had become an expression of the geometry of space and time. The other forces in nature, above all the force of electromagnetism, had not been described in such terms. But it seemed likely to Einstein that electromagnetism and gravity could both be explained as aspects of some broader mathematical structure. The quest for such an explanation — for a “unified field” theory that would unite electromagnetism and gravity, space and time, all together — occupied more of Einstein’s years than any other activity“.
However we have shown throughout the this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there would be many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in term of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time.
One is that it would allow for the unification gravity and electromagnetism by extrapolating the laws of a classical three-dimensional environment to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
Einstein gave us the ability to do this when he use the equation E=mc^2 and the constant velocity of light to define the geometric properties of space-time because that provided a method of converting a unit of time in his space-time universe to unit of space in one consisting of only four *spatial* dimensions .  Additionally because the velocity of light is constant he also defined a one to one quantitative correspondence between his space-time universe and one made up of four *spatial* dimensions.
The fact that one can use Einstein’s equations to qualitatively and quantitatively redefine the curvature in space-time he associated with energy in terms of four *spatial* dimensions is one bases for assuming as was done in the article “Defining energy?†Nov 27, 2007 that all forms of energy can be derived in terms of a spatial displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
One of the many advantages to using this approach is that it, as was shown in the article “Embedded Dimensions” Oct. 22, 2007 allows one to derive all forms of energy including gravity and electromagnetism in terms of a curvature or displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.Â
In other words it showed that one can derive gravity in terms of a differential force caused by a curvature or displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
This curvature is analogous to the space-time curvature Einstein associated with gravity.
Similarly the article “What is electromagnetism?“ Sept, 27 2007 showed one can derive the forces associated with electromagnetism in terms of the differential force caused by the “peaks” and “toughs” of a matter wave moving on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
Briefly it showed it is possible to derive the electromagnetic properties of electromagnetism by extrapolating the laws of Classical Wave Mechanics in a three-dimensional environment to a matter wave moving on a “surface” of three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
For example a wave on the two-dimensional surface of water causes a point on that surface to be become displaced or rise above or below the equilibrium point that existed before the wave was present. A force will be developed by the differential displacement of the surfaces, which will result in the elevated and depressed portions of the water moving towards or become “attracted” to each other and the surface of the water.
Similarly a matter wave on the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension would cause a point on that “surface” to become displaced or rise above and below the equilibrium point that existed before the wave was present.
Therefore, classical wave mechanics, if extrapolated to four *spatial* dimensions tells us a force will be developed by the differential displacements caused by a matter wave moving on a “surface” of three-dimensional space with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension that will result in its elevated and depressed portions moving towards or become “attracted” to each other.
This defines the causality of the attractive forces of unlike charges associated with the electromagnetic wave component of a photon in terms of a force developed by a differential displacement of a point on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
However, it also provides a classical mechanism for understanding why similar charges repel each other because observations of water show that there is a direct relationship between the magnitudes of a displacement in its surface to the magnitude of the force resisting that displacement.
Similarly the magnitude of a displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension caused by two similar charges will be greater than that caused by a single one. Therefore, similar charges will repel each other because the magnitude of the force resisting the displacement will be greater for two charges than it would be for a single charge.
One can define the causality of electrical component of electromagnetic radiation in terms of the energy associated with its “peaks” and “troughs” that is directed perpendicular to its velocity vector while its magnetic component would be associated with the horizontal force developed by that perpendicular displacement.
However, Classical Mechanics tells us a horizontal force will be developed by that perpendicular or vertical displacement which will always be 90 degrees out of phase with it. This force is called magnetism.
This is analogous to how the vertical force pushing up of on mountain also generates a horizontal force, which pulls matter horizontally towards the apex of that displacement.
However, as was mentioned earlier the gravity can also be explain by in terms of a differential force caused by a curvature in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
In other words the differential force cause buy a curvature in space created by the peaks and valley of an electromagnetic wave is no different than the curvature Einstein associated with gravity. The only difference is that gravity is unidirectional in terms of a “surface” of a three-dimension space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension while that of electromagnetism is bi-directional.
This shows how one can define a common mechanism for the causality of both electromagnetism and gravity in terms of a “unified field” consisting of four *spatial* dimension by extrapolating the laws of classical mechanics in a three-dimensional environment to four *spatial* dimensions.Â
Einstein was unable to accomplish this in terms of four-dimensional space-time because time is only observe to move in one direction forwards and therefore could not support the bi-directional spatial movement required to support the electromagnetic component of a wave moving on its “surface”.Â
It should be remember Einstein’s genius allows us to choose to define our universe in either a space-time environment or one consisting of four *spatial* dimension when he defined it in terms of the constant velocity of light. This interchangeability broadens the environment encompassed by his theories making them applicable to both the spatial as well as the time properties of our universe.
Later Jeff
Copyright 2008 Jeffrey O’Callaghan
0.9k1.1k7884041k
Wow, this piece of writing is good, my sister is analyzing such things, therefore
I am going to tell her.
Attractive component to content. I just stumbled upon your weblog
and in accession capital to claim that I get actually enjoyed account your
blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your feeds or even I fulfillment you get right of entry to consistently rapidly.
???????????? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ??????????? ?? ????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ????????? 1 ??????? ???? ??????????? ????????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ??????
Superb, what a webpage it is! This blog provides valuable information to us, keep it up.
Great blog here! Also your website rather a lot up
very fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I get your associate
link to your host? I desire my site loaded up as fast as
yours lol
With havin so much written content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism
or copyright infringement? My site has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but
it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over
the internet without my authorization. Do you know any solutions to help reduce content
from being stolen? I’d really appreciate it.
I’m extremely impressed with your writing abilities and also
with the structure on your weblog. Is that this a paid topic
or did you customize it your self? Either way stay up the excellent high
quality writing, it’s rare to look a nice weblog like this one
nowadays..
Pretty component of content. I simply stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to say that I acquire actually enjoyed
account your weblog posts. Anyway I will be
subscribing to your feeds and even I success you get right
of entry to consistently fast.
DIMEGLIO FUNDAMENTALLY UNIFIES PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE: WHERE IS THE SPACE OF DREAM EXPERIENCE IN RELATION TO WAKING EXPERIENCE?
Here is the fundamental and ultimate unification of physics. Here is why I have fundamentally and truly outsmarted the dream theorists and the mainstream, modern, academic, theoretical physicists, and for all time.
What is of consideration here is stabilized dist…ance in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched in waking experience (while standing) and in dreams. We always begin with common, natural, shared, basic, simple, fundamental, foundational, typical, and ordinary experience in establishing physical fundamentals/truths. The plain and simple truth is the best truth. It will be proven that dreams ultimately balance being AND experience.
Full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched. Gravity cannot be shielded. Consider the range of feeling/touch that we experience. The VISIBLE Earth/ground is seen, felt, AND touched.
The physicists consider inertia to be resistance to acceleration and resistance to change. The physicists basically, or for the most part, consider inertia to be an opposite of gravity, as they have never been able to explain the equivalency and balancing of inertia and gravity. The ultimate unification of physics combines, balances, and includes opposites. Dream experience combines, balances, and includes opposites.
In the Earth/ground, we cannot survive; as space is basically and fundamentally understood to be entirely touching us. Full gravity is the Earth/ground, and full inertia is outer space. The actual, real, and direct experience of outer space AS IT IS (including seen, felt, and touched) also destroys and precludes our being, experience (including visual), and thought. Notice that we are not touching anything in outer space, the space is black, and there is weightlessness. The middle distance in/of space is necessarily that of half inertia and half gravity. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Indeed, the experience of the eye IS the experience of the body.
The complete unification and BALANCING of gravity, electromagnetism, and inertia necessarily involves absolute and stabilized MIDDLE distance in/of space in conjunction with BOTH being AND experience that is seen, felt, AND touched.
Here are some of the main reasons regarding why ALL of this takes place in/as dream experience:
1) The space is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, so this IS the middle distance in/of space; and vision is possible in/as dream experience.
2) The body (beyond the eye/body) AND space may be visible or invisible.
3) Larger and smaller space in BALANCE is the MIDDLE distance in/of space. Dreams involve invisible and visible space that is equivalent and balanced.
4) Emotion is between (and in the MIDDLE of) thought and feeling. Dreams are an emotional experience. Emotion is differentiated (and manifest) as sensory experience and feeling.
HALF OR MIDDLE gravity involves the middle distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched. This means equivalent and balanced MIDDLE distance in/of space.
Dreams are not the experience of the space of the brain. I have proven this. Dreams are not thought. Dreams do not originate in the brain. Visual experience is not thought (even in the creation of thought that is television). Dreams are not a creation of thought. DREAMS ARE NOT A CREATION OF THE BRAIN. Dreams are not the physics of the brain. Dreams are not the experience of the brain. THERE IS NO OUTSMARTING THE GENIUS OF DREAMS.
Dreams involve the LINKED AND SEPARATE fundamental experience of our growth and becoming other than we are in keeping with the great truth that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. Indeed, if the self did not represent, form, and experience a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience, we would then be incapable of growth and of becoming other than we are.
I HAVE ALOT MORE THAT STANDS IN SUPPORT OF ALL OF THIS.
https://www.facebook.com/frank.dimeglio.77#!/pages/Author-Frank-Dimeglio-Publisher-Page/403682686386156
by Author Frank DiMeglio
Hey i just visited your website for the first time and i really liked it, i bookmarked it and is going to be back
G vs EM
— James Ph. Kotsybar
When life on this planet seems cumbersome
and weighted with serious magnitude,
delight dragged down by deep opprobrium,
I pad into the kitchen for some food.
In front of the refrigerator, I
see tacked with tacky magnets your sweet face ,
in the photograph taken last July,
and what was crushing becomes an embrace.
All the gravity of Earth seems flimsy,
it’s unyielding force demonstrably soft,
when refrigerator magnets’ whimsy
can anchor cheerful memories aloft.
Cold comfort may sound like a paradox,
but nourishment’s on both sides of this box.
Frank Martin DiMeglio: “F=ma ultimately means constant force/energy in conjunction with balanced and equivalent inertia/resistance to acceleration and gravity/acceleration.”
Dreams prove this. Dreams are the fundamental experience of the fundamental force/energy of physics. We originate at/from the center of the human body. Dreams are a linked center of body experience. I showed all of this.
In dreams, inertia is proportionately increased to the extent that gravity is decreased.
That is clear as well.
It is clear that I have unified gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism.
Space manifests as inertial/gravitational/electromagnetic energy in/as dream experience. Full gravity involves full mobility in relation to, and in conjunction with, distance in/of space. Full gravity involves full distance in/of space. The experience of space in/as dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space in keeping with half gravity and half inertia. Gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism are key to distance in/of space. Note that vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Gravity, invisible and visible, is key to distance in/of space. Note the experience of colors in dreams.
Space manifests in/as the middle distance in/of space in conjunction with half gravity and half inertia in dreams, and space is contracted/flattened and stretched/expanded in keeping therewith. Space manifests as gravitational/electromagnetic/inertial energy in dreams, thereby balancing attraction and repulsion.
Dreams are a linked center of body experience that are inseparable from our growth and our becoming other than we are.
Frank,
I love your new word ‘imagineer’ which I found at the beginning of your blog dedicated to the unification of the known forces. I liked the style of your presentation and the professionalism of the site, along with a lack of mathematical equations. It showed promise but seemed to me to still have the imagery of a space-time continuum, which is something I’ve steered away from incidentally.
My methodology was also as an imagineer, but with the addition of assuming that a fundamental mistake had been made before Einstein’s intervention. I came to the stark conclusion that Anglo-French rivalry had led Newton to dismiss Descartes’ imagery of Archimedes screws as the mediator of the gravity force. His diagram of 1644 shows the applicability of this line of thought. The helical screw analogy can just as easily represent a force of repulsion, which is an instant intuitive fit with the forces of elecrostatics and magnetism. Newton’s lack of a mechanism for the gravity effect left an equation which was fundamentally flawed from the outset. If only he had taken Descartes’ helical particle model more seriously we would be in a global economy which was no longer so dependent on fossil fuels. A knowledge of the quantum world will lead to huge resouces of much cheaper energy imo.
Kind regards, Alan
I simply found your internet web site a couple of days ago and that i have been reading through it regularly. you have a good range of useful info on the location and that i conjointly like the actual kind of the site at identical time. carry on the good work!
Quantum gravity requires the fundamental averaging of both gravity and inertia. It is important to grasp this most significant idea.
It is critical to understand that the fundamentally interactive nature and extensiveness of being, space, experience, and thought is central to any unified understanding of physics.
Indeed, space must be EQUALLY contracted (semi-detached from touch) AND expanded (again, semi-detached from touch) in conjunction with equivalent/balanced inertia and gravity and equivalent/balanced gravity and electromagnetism. Therefore, space manifests in accordance with the middle/typical distance in/of space in dreams. This balances/unifies repulsion and attraction as well.
This post goes a very long way in fundamentally explaining why modern physics is so generally and thoroughly lost.
by Author Frank Martin DiMeglio
Uniting inertia and gravity is the key to generally unifying and balancing attraction and repulsion. This would average both gravity and inertia (and acceleration as well). This makes space smaller by half and (on balance) larger by half.
The way to do this is to reduce gravity and inertia by half, so that they meet in the middle. I proved all of this.
Greetings. I would respectfully submit that the following is the definitive unification of gravity and electromagnetism.
http://radicalacademy.com/studentrefphilfmd13.htm
Decreased gravity may be offset/balanced by increased
inertia/immobilization, thereby balancing scale (distance in space). This balances attraction and repulsion, and this demonstrates space as gravitational/electromagnetic energy –in these different manifestations of the same. The MID-range of gravity is equivalent with the SEMI-immobilized condition therein — (picture us in outer space/the sun) vs. earth (full gravity) — in dreams. Touch/tactile experience is also at the same energy/feeling level as the gravitational experience in dreams. Read Mach on inertia and gravity.
Understanding that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of the totality of experience is crucial to ULTIMATELY understanding mathematical description and physics, and the limits thereof.
The gravitational contraction (to the center of the body) may be understood as being balanced by (and involving) an electromagnetic repulsion/expansion. Larger and smaller spaces (contracted space vs. outer space). The heightened concern/energy, touch/tactile experience, the gravity in dreams, semi/half immobilized/”inertialized” – they are
all manifestations of what is essentially the same. Union of gravity and electromagnetism. by Author Frank Martin DiMeglio
Hey, I found your blog while searching on Google your post looks very interesting for me. I will add a backlink and bookmark your site. Keep up the good work!
I’m Out! 🙂
This blog rocks! I gotta say, that I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,
A definite great read…:)
-Bill-Bartmann
Cool site, love the info.
Very nice!!