Gravity verses Dark energy

We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there are many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. One is that it allows one to understand the physical relationship between Dark Energy and gravity by extrapolating the … Read more

The Geometry of Young’s Double Slit Experiment

We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” that observations of our environment suggest that space is composed of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. If true one should be able to explain and predict the results of Young’s “Double-slit experiment in terms of that geometry. … Read more

The Flatness Problem

“The Flatness Problem” as it has come to be called by many cosmologist relates to the observation that some of the initial conditions of the universe appear to fine-tuned to very “special” values, and that a small deviation from these values would have had massive effects on the physical properties of the universe as it … Read more

How many dimensions do we need

to completely define the reality of our universe? Einstein was able to define the relativistic properties of motion and the equivalence of gravitational and accelerated reference frames in terms of the geometry of space-time.  However, as Lee Smolin mentions in Chapter Three (page 49) of his book “The Trouble with Physics” he was unable to … Read more

The Geometry of Dark energy

We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there are many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow one to derive a mechanism responsible for Dark Energy by extrapolating the laws … Read more