Why many physicists chose to define the universe in terms of the physical properties of a time or space-time dimension instead of four *spatial* dimensions is puzzling because, as was shown in the earlier article “Defining time” Sept 20, 2007 there is no observational evidence supporting it having physical properties. But even more damaging is … Read more
Quantum mechanistic defines our observable environment only in terms of the probabilistic values associated with Schrödinger’s wave equation. Many interpret this as meaning a particle and all other objects exists in a world of probabilities and only become connected to the environment when observed. Additionally it assumes that a particle is distributed or simultaneous exists … Read more
Quantum mechanistic defines our observable environment only in terms of the probabilistic values associated with Schrödinger’s wave equation. Many interpret this as meaning a particle and all other objects exists in a world of probabilities and only become connected to the environment when observed. Additionally it assumes that a particle is distributed or simultaneous exists … Read more
Is time travel possible? The laws of physics in the microscopic world suggest that it is because the physical processes they define at the subatomic level appear to be either entirely or mostly time symmetric. In other words the theoretical statements that describe them remain true if the direction of time is reversed. However, the … Read more
Is the quantization of energy/mass a fundamental or an emergent characteristic of reality. Quantum mechanics assumes that it is fundamental because it defines all interactions within it in terms of its quantized properties while one could say that Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity defines it in terms of an emergent property of continuous space-time manifold … Read more