Why four spatial dimensions?

We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there would be several theoretical advantages to defining the universe in term of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. For example, it would enable physicists to define a theoretical model that could explain and predict the uncertainty … Read more

An alternative to a singularity?

Many physicists assume based on the General Theory of Relativity the mass of larger stars that have used up their nuclear fuel will implode to form a singularity or black hole.  (A singularity is defined as region of space in which mass is concentrated in a one-dimensional point in space and whose gravitational field is … Read more

Incorporating electromagnetism into General and Spatial Relativity

Einstein, in his theory of relativity derived the force of gravity in terms of the geometry of space and time.  Unfortunately he was unable describe the other forces in nature, above all the force of electromagnetism, in same terms, as was documented by the American Institute of Physics. “From before 1920 until his death in … Read more

The Equivalence Principal in four *spatial* dimensions.

This article is a collaboration between Benny Creemers, a proponent of Super Relativity and Jeff.  Please visit his web site to gain a different perspective on this subject and Mark Fiorentino site for a discussion of the principals of Super Relativity.) We have shown throughout this blog there would be many advantages to defining our universe … Read more

Absolute time and space in four *spatial* dimensions

(This article is a collaboration between Benny Creemers, a proponent of Super Relativity and Jeff.  Please visit his web site to gain a different perspective on this subject and Mark Fiorentino site for a discussion of the principals of Super Relativity.) We have shown throughout the this blog and its companion book “The Reality of … Read more